A Tribute to the of






A slight detour to the Bronze Age again, dear readers, when we explore one of the unfortunate victims of the infamous DC Implosion, circa 1978 when apparently 57 titles were axed to include the subject of this review.  It's Firestorm, the Nuclear Man, who first appeared in his own magazine in March of 1978 (on sale December 6, 1977).  Firestorm, at least this original version, was the co-creation of Gerry Conway and Al Milgrom with Gerry doing the writing and Al penciling.  Inking was accomplished by Klaus Janson and Josef Rubinstein.  The rest of the creative team includes Todd Klein on lettering, Adrienne Roy taking care of colors and editing by Jack C. Harris.  Al also did that dynamic cover (+ back).

The setting for "Make Way For Firestorm!", is Manhattan and this new hero is zipping around the skyline with the enthusiasm of a teenager, which isn't so strange when we soon learn that he is a teenager, at least in part.

We quickly learn that Firestorm can not only fly, but change his own atomic structure and that of objects around him.  Furthermore, he seems to be carrying on a dialogue with a mysterious, disembodied voice, who addresses him as "Ronald" and who he calls, "Professor."  He quickly flies to a nuclear power plant in south Jersey and after effortlessly flying through the wall, discovers several lowlifes with dynamite up to no good.  Abruptly, it's flashback time.  12 hours prior, to be precise, and Firestorm is recalling when he, as Ronnie Raymond, transfer student, was making a bit of a splash with his athletic prowess, garnering the attention of Doreen Day, for one and immediately making her beau, Clifford Carmichael jealous.  After some goading by Carmichael, Raymond is feeling pretty angry and unsettled in his new school.  Apparently his father's work has kept them moving around.  Nothing like being the new kid and being a target first thing out of the gate.  The principal, Wallace Hapgood is taking an interest in Ronnie's situation, but it's time to segue to the Hudson nuke plant, where a full-blown protest is in progress while inside, Professor Martin Stein, Nobel prize winning physicist and the plant's designer is savoring it's completion.  He describes it as "The world's first fully-automated, fail-safe nuclear generating plant."  Before he can fully enjoy his triumph, however, his former assistant, Doctor Danton Black, has arrived with representatives of the Nuclear Regulations Council to investigate Stein's alleged theft of Black's plans for the plant.  Stein retorts that he fired Black for theft, but the Council members issue an official cease and desist document until the allegations can be investigated.  Stein realizes this could be the death knell of the fruits of his labors and angrily decides the plant will go online with or without the injunction.

We soon learn that Ronnie Raymond has lost his mother and his father is fully, perhaps too fully, engaged in his work at the paper and when another late night calls, he idly watches the news, which features an interview with Edward Earhart, leader of the protesters at the nuke plant.  Ronnie has an inspiration to join with them in an effort to impress Doreen.  Soon he's at the coalition HQ, meeting Earhart and volunteering his services.  Eddie is quick to take Ronnie on and soon the group is off to the plant, where they calmly break through the fence.  When Raymond questions their actions, they accost him, after announcing their plan to blow up the plant.  Stein has been observing via monitor and observes that with the plant officially shut down, there is no security.  He tries to intervene, but soon both men are out cold near the atomic pile.  A timer is set and the protestors hastily depart.  Ronnie soon regains consciousness and elsewhere on the premises, Danton Black has returned.

Raymond tries to stop the explosion from taking place, but he's too late and an odd chain reaction of sorts takes place, affecting Ronnie Raymond, Professor Stein and Danton Black in unexpected ways.  The dramatic result for Raymond and Stein is sort of an amalgam of the two of them, with stunning new abilities to alter atomic structures.  He christens himself Firestorm, as the aftermath of an atomic explosion.  The world's first Nuclear Man.  Just then, Ronnie becomes aware of the presence in his mind of Professor Martin Stein, who explains a little of what has just happened with their fusion and remarking that due to the fact he was unconscious during the event, Ronnie is more or less in charge of this new being, while Stein will be in an advisory mode and able to provide information.  Off now to seek Eddie Earhart.

Doctor Danton Black, the other victim of the explosion, is glowing and is also regaining consciousness, but we leave him now and rejoin the present, when Firestorm is engaging the thugs at the other location, using his newfound abilities to wreak havoc with their scheme to blow another nuke plant.  Despite Firestorm's intervention, a desperate Eddie Earhart is able to trigger the dynamite, but Firestorm discovers he can absorb the energy from the explosion into his body.  He decks Eddie, then flies off and once he gets close to home, he accidentally sees his reflection in a window and is shocked to say the least.  He literally shrieks that he wants to be Ronnie Raymond again and abruptly, he gets his wish when he and Professor Stein separate into two distinct beings again.  The story concludes with both figures walking away and talking and promises of a new menace in the next issue with Multiplex, the Duplicate Menace!

I thought Firestorm was a pretty original concept with some genuine potential as a new character.  The series fell victim to the cuts at DC as mentioned above, after a mere five issues (#3, #4 & #5), but Firestorm did return in a couple of incarnations and he's recently been spotted in animated form and has spent time as a member of the Justice League, so it just goes to prove you can't keep a good concept down for long.

And now I'd like to introduce you to co-creator Al Milgrom, who graciously spent some of his valuable time enlightening me about his prolific career.  Take it away, Al:

Prof:  How did you get your start?

Allen Milgrom:  My first year in the business I worked for Murphy Anderson as a background inker.  That was my first paying job in the industry.  I came out to New York from Michigan with samples.  My childhood buddy Jim Starlin had come out a year earlier.  He was in the Navy and after his discharge, this was the early 70's, he came out to New York and started getting some work and I was in college and came out here after I'd graduated.  Jim was doing stuff for Marvel and DC and doing breakdowns or layouts for John Romita on some of the Spider-Man material and when I came out I wasn't quite ready to get work on my own, but I was good enough to start doing some background work for Murphy.  I showed my samples up at DC and either Joe Orlando or maybe it was Carmine Infantino called Murphy in and asked, "Murph, could you use help from this guy?"  "Yeah."  So shortly afterward I started working for him.  I had actually done one inking job prior for Charlton and that was while I was still living back in Michigan and I got that through Rich Buckler, who, at least at the time we were friendly.  (Chuckle.)  We're not now.  I won't go into that now, but the bottom line was that he was already out here and he was starting to get some work and a friend of his here named Jim Janes had penciled a job for Charlton and he wasn't a good inker or didn't feel he was a good inker, so they needed one for the job and Rich told them about me and the next thing I know I was inking a short 5 or 6 page Charlton job for maybe ten bucks a page.  I remember my mother was horrified at how little money it was.  And frankly I did not do the best job in the world, and I wasn't really ready yet, either, but Charlton, God bless 'em, (chuckle) they couldn't afford to be very choosy about the work even though they had some very good people working for them.  So that was my first experience.  Jim Janes was an interesting guy.  He lived on Staten Island and he did some comics.  I know he did some Legion of Super-Heroes at one point for DC and I believe he must have moved to California, because I've seen his name on the credits of some of the DC animated shows.  I don't remember which ones off hand, but I know he's done stuff for them.  So he's one of these guys who was a good solid artist, but he didn't seem to have a distinctive enough style to stay in comics, so he ended up getting probably a much better paying gig on the West Coast doing the animation for a lot of these characters.  Storyboards and so forth.

Prof:  Sort of following in the footsteps of Mike Sekowsky and Alex Toth.

AM:  Yeah and Kirby did that for a while, too.  Gil Kane may have, too.  A lot of guys who either got fed up with comics or could do better doing storyboard work or whatever ended up doing that.  My good buddy from Michigan, Mike Vosberg did some storyboard/animation stuff for a while and now he's doing stuff for motion pictures including the Narnia films.  And Brett Blevins, who is a very good artist and did comics for awhile who was…well, not exactly my protégé, but I met him when he was 13 and started sending samples to me when I was an editor at DC and I thought he had a lot of potential and when I went back to work as an editor for Marvel I told him to stay in touch and send me more samples and I would sort of go over his stuff and send him critiques and tell him how I thought he could correct the work.  He's very good and I believe he's doing storyboard work for the Batman cartoon show and I think he makes a lot more money doing that than he ever did doing comic book work.

Prof:  Now weren't you considered to be one of the Crusty Bunkers at Continuity Associates? 

AM:  Anybody who did any work to help out on a Continuity job was considered a Crusty Bunker, so I did some work under that banner, I guess. (Chuckle.) 

Prof:  Was it by design or something you just fell into? 

AM:  Anybody who happened by the studio…we'd go there to hang out.  We'd talk to Neal, to watch and see what he was doing.  Jack Abel rented space there.  Jack was a good friend of mine and again one of the old-timers, as it were and also a fellow background guy for Murphy Anderson at one point, unfortunately.  Unfortunately because Jack had actually been inking Superman for DC and at some point they told him that look, that slick house look that DC had used for many years, the stuff that Bernie Sachs and the Barry brothers and Joe Giella and Frank Giacoia, all those kind of guys, he had a look sort of in that ballpark.  I'm not saying it looked exactly the same, but in any case at some point Carmine told him, "Look, we're not using the style any more and we want everybody to ink like Dick Girodano."  Jack at the time said, "Well who else inks like Dick Giordano?"  Which was valid.  And at the time Carmine said, "Well, like Vinnie Colletta."  And Vinnie…I can kind of see where Carmine made that judgment.  There was a very slight surface resemblance between Vinnie and Dick's, but Dick's was so far superior.

Prof:  Oh, yeah.

AM:  Jack was just flabbergasted.  He got very discouraged and for a while there just was doing backgrounds for Murphy and I used to ask him why he just didn't go back to Marvel.  He'd been inking Iron Man for Gene Colan at Marvel and apparently they loved his stuff because one thing Marvel lacked in the early days was good inkers.  They had Dick Ayers, who was not as slick and they had some.  They had Joe Sinnott who did some work and so forth, but they really lacked polished inkers for a long time and he said that he felt that since he left Iron Man to go to DC they just wouldn't give him any work.  The truth is they would have been happy to have him back.

Prof:  I'm sure you're right.  They had so few standout inkers at that point I would imagine they'd have snapped him up.

AM:  Now Ditko inked his own stuff and that was terrific.  There were some guys.  Don Heck would pencil and ink his own stuff and other people's stuff.  George Roussous inked a lot of Kirby and some Ditko and so on but I think Jack, being an old-school guy and taking into account that the industry had been so vindictive to the old guys in some ways.  If you went to the competition they wouldn't necessarily take you back.  I think that was especially true of DC in those days.  Less so for Marvel, but I don't think he realized that.  I used to yell at him after the fact:  "Jack, what could it have cost you to go back to Marvel?"  "Well, I should have…"  So anyway, he was actually doing backgrounds for Murphy for a while and Dave Cockrum had also done backgrounds for Murph and at some point Wayne Howard, the Wally Wood imitator.  He did a lot of work for Charlton on his own and he was also doing backgrounds for Murphy which was good because Wayne was a very solid guy who did good brushwork and of course being a Wood impressionist and Wood being heavily influenced by Hal Foster and Murph being heavily influenced by Hal Foster it was a good mesh.

Prof:  You mentioned Vinnie Colletta earlier and he had kind of a reputation as a hack inker.

AM:  I wasn't really a friend of Vinnie and I didn't like his work, but I did when I was a kid and he was inking Kirby on Thor and you can't hurt Kirby.  You can help him, but you can't hurt him.  The stuff is so powerful and the stories are so well told.  It's such exciting, dynamic stuff and as a kid I would look at that stuff and it was, "Oh, yeah, it looks like Hal Foster," which of course was highly inaccurate, but just the fact that it was a lot of hatchy pen work and of course that was not true of Foster at all who virtually inked everything with a brush, but it had the tale to it that it was different and I just thought, "Oh, that looks good."  And I liked it as a contrast to the stuff Sinnott was inking on FF or Giacoia was inking on Captain America, so as a kid I certainly liked Vinnie's stuff well enough, but as I got older and I could see a lot of the rendering he did was just sort of meaningless hash marks and lines for the sake of lines.  They didn't really give you a tone, they didn't give you a texture, they didn't define muscle mass or anything like that and of course years later when I saw that he would wholesale erase backgrounds rather than ink them, or (chuckle) I know one penciller told me, "You know I did this whole sequence and there was a crowd and there was backgrounds and Vinnie drew in a brick wall and inked it in black."  He covered up all the extra stuff but the main figures and the panels were there, but everything else, he just put a brick wall in front of them.  That will save you some time, I guess.  You know as fast as Vinnie was, I'm not sure how much time he really saved doing that, but I guess he must have figured he was saving some and Kirby used to draw these sort of ornate 1930's and 40's style buildings; Manhattan style buildings but having that kind of brick work and filigree and all kinds of stuff going on and Vinnie a lot of times would just take the shape and ink a skyscraper.  Make it a skyscraper with glass windows and not make it with any detail.  Just drop everything out.  When I found that out it tended to lessen my (chuckle) regard for Vinnie as an inker.

Prof:  (Laughter.)  I think you're in good company based on some stories I've heard before.  He didn't have much of a fan club. 

AM:  One time he was inking a job of mine and I wasn't too thrilled about that, either.  By the way as far as inkers, when I went to work for Murphy, he had two sayings.  Murphy, as you probably know, is a funny guy and likes to make puns, but also would pass along things like this:  "Allen, Allen, you know the first two rules of inking that you should know?"  "What's that, Murphy?"  "When in doubt, black it out; and we're paid to ink, not think."

Prof:  (Laughter.)

AM:  And of course he was being facetious because of course nobody thought more about the work he did on stuff than Murphy.  He certainly never just inked what was there because he would always add that Murphy Anderson polish to it, that finish.  In some ways it was great and admirable and in some ways it probably disguised the identity of the penciller.  I know that at least one time a penciller mentioned to me that he wished Murphy would just stay a little closer to his pencils and not turn it into Murphy Anderson every time, but he also said, "Look, Murphy is a great talent and I love his work, I just don't want my work to look like his work necessarily."  That was Irv Novick, I believe.

Prof:  Yeah, I got the impression when I talked to Carmine Infantino…he didn't come right out and say so, but I got the idea that he wasn't real happy sometimes with Murph's inking over his pencils.

AM:  I can understand that on one level because if you see Carmine's pencils, if you see it when he inked his own stuff it had a very different look to it.  Carmine's stuff in the 50's and 60's, the Detective Chimp stuff and probably even when he was inking those Elongated Man stories for DC he had a very graphic, modern-looking approach and I think I read one time…I don't know Carmine well in that I never sat down and had any long conversations with him, which I regret, but he said he had trimmed down a fountain pen and used that to ink with and you look at some of the line work that he did and you can sort of see it.  It's got kind of a dead line sort of look to it and you get that little hook at the end of the line sometimes when you're using that kind of a pen.  Murphy inked his work with a lot of brush and a lot of rendering and a lot of good, solid, but Murphy Andersonish and Hal Fosterish kind of rendering of form and Carmine's stuff was sort of sleek and angular and Murphy's stuff was very round.  Now having said that, I loved the combination.  I thought it almost didn't make sense, but sometimes loving the stuff you grew up with reading, with the Flash and Adam Strange stuff that they did together was great together.  It had Carmine's story telling and graphic design layout sense and it had Murphy's beautiful rendering and I just loved the combination.

Prof:  Unbeatable.

AM:  Yeah.  Terrific.  So I can see why Carmine might not have loved it, but at the same time the end results were great and the same is true when Murphy inked Gil Kane.  It was something of a mismatch also but again the finished product was quite good when Murphy inked him on Green Lantern or the Atom or whatever.  I wonder who Carmine did like as an inker?  I wonder if he liked Joe Kubert?  Then again, Joe Kubert took it over and made it look a lot like Joe Kubert. 

Prof:  As a matter of fact I asked him and he told me his favorite inker was Frank Giacoia.

AM:  Okay, I can see that.  I was going to guess possibly Dick Giordano also because Dick has that sort of angular, 50's and 60's sort of graphic look and I liked it when he inked Carmine.  I don't remember what all they did together, but I know they did some of that Human Target stuff and that was a nice look.  Slick and crisp blacks and so forth, so that was a nice look, but Giacoia, yeah, I could see that.  And you know what, I actually own an original page of Carmine's from the first Deadman story.

Prof:  Goodness!

AM:  Yeah.  It's a real nice page and I bought it somewhere at a convention or something and it was inked by George Roussous and George, who was a very sweet guy…he was a little rough in the inks.  He was from that Morton Meskin school and his stuff, I thought really worked on Carmine and again because it was more graphic.  It was angular and it had real juicy blacks.  Not quite as polished as the pen work, but that page that I have is very nice.  I like that whole origin story that he did.  I don't think he inked Carmine a lot, and maybe that's because Carmine didn't like his work.  I don't know for sure, but at least on that one story he made it look good at least to me.  Do you remember the story?  Actually it's the page where Deadman is still alive and he's talking to the girl in the circus and they're standing in front of a mirror and it's a 2/3 page sort of a splash page.  It's quite a nice page.  He's putting his hand to her head or something and she's upset.

Prof:  Yeah, I've got the reprint volume, The Deadman Collection, so I think I know exactly the one you're talking about.  Boston Brand is talking to Lorna or whatever her name was, the circus owner. 

AM:  Yeah.

Prof:  That is an outstanding page and probably worth a mint, too.

AM:  It probably didn't cost me an arm and a leg, either, back in the day.

Prof:  That's just it.  I don't know if you keep up at all, but those old pages are just skyrocketing in value it seems or at least what they go for.  Value can be kind of subjective, but they're commanding some impressive prices. 

AM:  I know that to be the case and (chuckle) in one way I guess it's good because it means if I ever get desperate enough for funds, which I may…I'm not getting a lot of work these days, and Archie, although I enjoy working for Archie, the rates are very low, relatively.  The work is a lot easier, relatively, but there's also not an unlimited amount of work available.  And since I'm not getting any work from DC or Marvel at present, selling some of the pages might end up being a necessity.

Prof:  Do you think the way the industry has been going that inkers will become altogether obsolete?

AM:  I'm sure they'd be happy to do it if the quality was there, because it's a business.  They've already done it to letterers, but I tip my hat to Archie comics because they still use letterers.  They still letter on the boards.  And according to Victor Gorelick, they've looked into it and really it doesn't save that much money.  Maybe it doesn't save them any money by using a computerized font.  I'm not sure why that's true.  DC and Marvel have done it.  I'm glad, though, because my friend Jack Morelli, who was a staple at Marvel and then when they went the computer route the next thing you know he was doing work for DC and then they went the computer route and the next thing you know he was working odd jobs; driving a tow truck, working for the school system up where he lives and basically when I started working for Archie I said, "Do you need any letterers?"  They said, "We could use one or two to help out our main guy and I hooked Jack up and he started doing some work for them and a guy named Bill Yoshida, who I think was 80 passed away a couple of years back and then suddenly Jack became I think probably their primary letterer.  Maybe even Clem Robins is doing work for them.

Prof:  I'm not sure.  I know he was working with Mike Mignola on Hellboy at Dark Horse recently.  I do know that Clem, Todd Klein and Tom Orzechowski all do both methods but will still hand letter. 

AM:  Maybe it's Todd who is doing some work for Archie.  I haven't talked to Tom in a long time, but he was another old Detroit guy.

Prof:  Tom's been busy with a few things, primarily Savage Dragon last I knew.

AM:  John Workman still does a lot of hand lettering, too.  In fact he's working for Archie right now and other places.  I'm working with him now on some of that new look Archie stuff if you're familiar with it.

Prof:  Yeah, wasn't Breyfogle doing some of that?

AM:  Yeah, Norm, who I don't know well, though I published some of his work in Fanfare back in the day, he just did one.  I've inked several of them.  One over Steven Butler, one over Joe Staton and a couple over Todd Smith and I'm working on one right now by Rod Wiggum, however I think this may be the last one they do.  They weren't as popular as they'd hoped so that experiment is going away.

Prof:  That's unfortunate.  I didn't pick up any of the books myself, but it looked intriguing.

AM:  I guess they thought they'd do some slightly less funny, slightly more controversial stories and use a more straight, serious cartooning style, almost like a romance comic, I suppose.  Many of the stories, not all, but many are adaptations of prose novels that Archie did in conjunction with Walt Disney.  I guess Disney published them, using the Archie characters and Archie adapted them back to comic book form.  That was sort of an unusual chain of events.  First they were written and now they're written and drawn and they started out under Disney's auspices and now they're back under Archie's.  Archie is an interesting company that way.  They have all those superhero characters and they've leased those back to DC some years back and DC was doing The Fly and The Shield and all that stuff and now they've done it again.  I don't know what DC is doing with them.  Maybe they're just putting together a line.  I'd like to find out, because the one character that I've always wanted to do, professionally, and never have is The Fly.  That was a comic I really loved when I was a kid when it first came out.  I don't think I even knew it was Kirby at the time, or Joe Simon and/or Kirby at the time.  But I remember getting that first issue and just thinking it was the greatest thing ever and finding out later that it was Kirby.  I liked the character.  I liked the mood of it, the whole premise, the orphaned kid and all.  I just loved it, and I'd love to work on that character.

Prof:  Hopefully the opportunity will present itself.

AM:  I've got to try and track down who at DC is doing it.  Certainly at this point nobody wants to give me any penciling work, but they might be willing to let me ink something.  I've done some inking for DC recently.

Prof:  Which projects?

AM:  A lot of stuff with Starlin the last couple of years and also last year I just inked a six-issue Ambush Bug series by Keith Giffen.  Basically (chuckle) they'll only let me ink really old guys.

Prof:  There does seem to be a little age bias out there.

AM:  I don't know.  It may or may not be true.  They may just not think my work is current enough to look good over the current new crop of pencillers.  They never say that.  They always say, "Oh, yeah, we'll keep you in mind," but really what that means is they're trying to forget you.  Getting rid of you when you call or write.  It's hurtful, and the difference is when my generation of guys got into the industry we were excited to work with guys whose work we'd always read.  Working with Murphy, one of the last things I did, the last thing I penciled probably for DC was a 3-issue team-up of Hawkman and Adam Strange and I penciled it and Murphy inked it.  That was a big thrill for me because I liked those characters from when I was a kid, but again, not only had I worked for Murph, but I grew up really enjoying his work and it was a treat to get him to ink me.  I've been inked by Jim Mooney and Giacoia and Joe Sinnott…a lot of Joe Sinnott, and we were glad to work with those guys and we made sure they always got plenty of work and we kept them busy and so on and so forth and the current crop is sort of coming in where the pencilers have their own inkers or the inkers have their own pencilers depending on which way you want to look at it and they don't seem to want to keep the old guys employed, which is kind of a shame.

Prof:  Very much so.  By the way, speaking of thrills I notice that over the course of your career you got to ink both Kirby and Ditko at various points.

AM:  Yeah, in fact, since you bring it up, I've inked Kirby and I've done cover sketches for Kirby.  When Gerry Conway was Editor-in-Chief at Marvel, he liked my cover layouts and Kirby was working for Marvel again, but he didn't want to have to sift through copies of pencils again to figure out what cover scene to do.  I was on the West Coast at the time, so he'd say, "Here.  Figure out the cover scene for this issue and then do a sketch and Kirby will draw the pencils."  I said, "Okay, but on one condition:  I want to ink Kirby's pencils on it."  I always described it as a Kirby sandwich.  I was the bread and Kirby was the meat.  I would do a sketch, he would do the pencils and I would do the inks.  I didn't get to do all the ones that I did sketches for, but a fair number.  I did a bunch of Avengers covers, Iron Man, Defenders and Ghost Rider.  In fact when I did that I was at a San Diego convention and they were selling some Kirby artwork.  I think it was Jack's son, maybe or at least some relative of his.  They were selling some of the covers that I'd inked and I guess Kirby had a deal with Marvel at the time where he got all his originals back.  I don't know if anybody told me that at the time, but there they were selling off a bunch of covers that I'd inked and I said, "Oh, I inked these, I'd really like to buy some of them."  And they gave me a very, very cheap price.

Certainly by today's standards.  At the time it was probably just a little inexpensive, but now it's absurdly inexpensive and I brought back as many as I could afford at the time.  I've got a nice little handful of Kirby covers.

Prof:  Fantastic.  It doesn't seem like anything with Jack's name on it goes for less than four or five figures these days.

AM:  Yeah, it's astonishing and you know maybe even more astonishing because he did so much work.  If there's anybody out there where there's no shortage of their work, it's Jack Kirby.  But on the other hand, I think it's a testament to just how good he was and what an impression he made on several generations of both fans and artists.

Prof:  Yeah, and obviously continues to inspire.  In fact, it appeared to me that the cover to Firestorm #1 looks reminiscent of Jack's work.  Am I off base on that?

AM:  No, not at all.  I was very much going for a Kirby sort of powerful…in fact, I've told this before; at the time when I was doing those covers for DC, what happened was that I was doing cover sketches for Kirby and a fair number of covers for Marvel on my own.  I was up at Continuity and I was showing off the stuff to Neal, because that's what we did.  (Chuckle.)  "Oh, look, Neal.  Look what I got to do.  I did these sketches for Kirby and I did these other covers," and at the time I think Neal was dating Jenette Kahn.  So he said, "Let me borrow these a minute."  Jenette was apparently hanging out in one of the other rooms at Continuity at the time.  I didn't know it and he went and showed them to her, and the next thing I knew I got a call from Joe Orlando saying, "Yeah, Jenette really likes the covers you've been doing and wants you to do some for us."  At the time I was working primarily, if not exclusively, for Marvel.  So I said, "Okay, sure," and I started doing some work for DC, but the funny thing is I went in and talked to Joe, and he said, "Well, Jenette likes your covers, but we don't want you to do those covers that look like Marvel covers."  And I said, "Oh."  It didn't really make sense to me because I was too young and stupid and ignorant to question it, so I tried to alter my style to look more like what I thought of as DC stuff which was, of course, exactly what Jenette did not want.  I worked for Marvel and she wanted me to do stuff that was in that vein.  So I started doing these covers for Orlando and then he called me into the office and he said, "Yeah, Jenette's not happy with the stuff you're doing because it's not like the stuff you're doing at Marvel," and I said, "Joe.  You told me not to do stuff that looked like Marvel," and he replied, "Yeah, I know, I know."  No apology, no "Gosh, I made a mistake."  I don't know if he resented Jenette telling him who to use, or I don't know if he was trying to sabotage me or if he was just resenting Jenette telling him what to do.  I have no idea.  I don't think it was necessarily malicious.  If I'd have been a little older and a little more confident I'd have probably told him, "Look, I either do it the way I do it or there's no point in me doing the work for you," and maybe then she would have been happier.  (Laughter.)  Certainly that (Firestorm) cover.  By then I'd been hired as an editor at DC, as well as freelance.  On Firestorm I definitely wanted a Kirby feel to that first cover.

Prof:  Well, you certainly pulled it off and you mentioned in the e-mail that you felt that was one of your few characters that had some legs.  I found it fascinating that Firestorm and Killer Frost had a fairly juicy role in Crisis on Infinite Earths. 

AM:  I didn't even know that.  I never read that series.  By the time that was coming out I was so busy working every day and every night and weekends and holidays (chuckle) that I hardly read any of the comics.  I should probably get the reprinted edition and read it over.  Is that the one George Perez did, and inked by Gerry Ordway?

Prof:  Yes.

AM:  Artistically I thought that was a great, great combination and I really liked the way it looked, but I never actually read it to see what was going on.

Prof:  I think you'd enjoy it and as I said it should be somewhat gratifying to see your characters, not necessarily in a pivotal role, but they are spotlighted in a couple of places and I thought that was a nice tribute to you and Gerry's work. 

AM:  Well, Gerry certainly.  Firestorm, when I did it, lasted all of five issues.  That, of course, was the time of the DC Implosion.

Prof:  It sounds like they had to chop off everything possible at the time, so I certainly wouldn't call that a failure.  That sounded like pretty dark days.

AM:  It was a weird, weird situation.  If I recollect things properly, and I'm not sure I do, apparently what happened was DC and Marvel got together and every couple of years they'd have to raise the price of the comics by about a nickel and they got together and said, "Look, it's crazy to have to raise the price every couple of years, so why don't we just double the price from a quarter to fifty cents, add a lot more content so that it's actually a good value for the readers, and just jump up to fifty cents and not have to keep pussy-footing around every couple of years with these five cent increases every time the paper costs and printing costs go up."  So they had a sort of gentleman's agreement to do this.  So what happened was DC was gearing up and they were promoting "The DC Explosion," and they were doing a weird thing.  Instead of actually doubling the page count, which would have made sense; comics are 32 pages, which works out to 8 pages per sheet and they printed them on these giant sheets of newsprint, and what they would do is they would print 16 pages at a time.  So they'd do two of those for an entire issue and they would fold, fold, fold and then trim them and then you had your 32-page comic book.  So they were going to add a half a folio, I think is the term, so DC decided to go from 32 pages to 40 pages, which was only an additional 8 pages, so it was half an additional folio or whatever the unit is called.  So it was a little more expensive to do that because now you had to get half that sheet of newsprint and fold it and cut it.  It would have been more efficient to do an additional 16 pages, but they were afraid to jump up the page count that much.  So they went through this whole process and they had the agreement with Marvel, that they were both going to do it and DC was creating all new material so they came out with a bunch of new titles and a bunch of new backup features.  In that same month that they brought those out, Marvel did the lead features, but they used a lot of reprints with maybe some new material.  And what happened was Marvel did it for one month and then they went back to the old format.  Without telling DC.  So they basically pulled a bait and switch.  They said, "Yeah, we'll go along with that.  We'll both go so the whole industry will be suddenly bet twice as much with an increase of an 8-page count, blah, blah, blah," and they basically reneged on the deal.  They backed out and went back, so DC's out there with their over-priced comics and Marvel maybe raised their price by the traditional nickel, but they were still thirty cents compared to fifty cents and they basically just slaughtered DC on the newsstand.  DC was stuck there with an unwieldy, in terms of the expense, product.  I suppose if you want to look at it from a cynical business aspect, Marvel was very smart to do it, but kind of dishonest.  Then again, what's the old term?  A verbal agreement is worth the paper it's written on.

Prof:  That's it.

AM:  Nobody had any legal duty to stay at that size, so they basically screwed DC.  So DC, which had been expanding and had been promoting the DC Explosion now had to cancel 40% of the titles and they fired 40% of the staff, which sounds worse than it was because basically they fired several of their new hires, so it was me and Larry Hama and neither of us were really affected by that because we just ended up working for Marvel; both going right back there and working as editors.  I don't' know who else they had to get rid of, but I don't think they had to fire too many people on staff who had been there for long periods of time, if anybody.  They kept Jack Harris and the other new editor was actually Ross Andru, who I always thought would have been better off as a penciler.  Not to disparage his editorial abilities.  I don't even really remember what he edited, but I just thought Ross was a terrific artist and it was a shame for him not to be doing probably what he did best.

Prof:  Exactly.  You see it in other professions quite often, too.  Just because you're a good journeyman or whatever at whatever you do doesn't necessarily mean you should be thrust into an executive position. 

AM:  Yeah, it's the Peter Principle.

Prof:  That's it, although in your case it seems like the reports I've heard held you as a pretty beloved editor when you held that title.

AM:  Well, gee, I'm glad to hear it.  I don't know who said it, but it's very nice to hear.  With me, it was kind of an experiment.  I love comics and I just wanted to do comics and I'd only been in the business a handful of years, really.  I started in '72 working for Murph and one year later I'm doing some work on my own, so this was maybe '77 when the DC Implosion happens.  I'd only been in the business really 4 years, not counting my years as a background guy and I wanted to see how the other half lived.  I knew how the freelancers lived.  (Laughter.)  I wanted to learn the process of editing and I wanted to see what it was like trying to put together the right talent to make an interesting package and be involved in all the phases of it and frankly when I took the job at DC I don't know that I really thought of it as a long term gig.  I just decided, "I'll try this out for awhile."  And at the end of the year when they said, "Good-bye," I said, "Okay, back to freelancing," and I went over to Marvel and actually said, "Hey, DC fired me.  Any chance of getting some freelance work?"  And DC, by the way, at the time said, "Hey, you guys get first priority in terms of freelance."  But nobody offered me any work up there at the time.  I didn't really go actively looking for it, but nobody came down to my office and said, "Hey, Al, before you leave, you want to be come the inker on this, or pencil this or that?"  And probably the truth is, with the cutbacks, they may not have had work available and would have had to can somebody else to give us work.  Can freelancers, that is.  So I never really thought much about it.  I went back to Marvel and said, "Hey, any chance of me getting some more work here?"  And Jim Shooter said, "I think we might have something for you."  "Great."  That same day somebody gave me some Star Wars pages because it was in a bind, and I thought, "Okay."  I thought they were going to offer me a book or two, but Jim, who was newly minted as the Editor-in-Chief, offered me an editorial position and I thought, "Well, I don't think I really got the full impact of the job after only one year," so he convinced me to take it, so I proceeded to work as an editor for Marvel for five years, so if the people liked me, or were happy with me as an editor, I'm glad to hear it.  Or maybe that means I wasn't doing my job.  I don't know.  (Mutual laughter.)

More to come from the great Al Milgrom in the conclusion to this interview next time, so be sure to come back in about two weeks to enjoy more. 

As a matter of fact, it just occurred to me that while I haven't been able to serve one up every single time, we just recently passed the milestone of three years of interviews here at the dear old Silver Lantern.  I couldn't be more pleased.

As always, your patronage is appreciated, dear reader.  Let me know what's on your mind by firing an e-mail my way at: professor_the@hotmail.com.

See you again soon at this locale and…

Long live the Silver Age!



© 2000-2010 by B.D.S.

Interview copy edited by Al Milgrom


This feature was created on 05/01/00 and is maintained by

B.D.S.

 





The Silver Lantern Site Menu + Map & Updates

HomeThe SageSage Archives1934-19551956
19571958195919601961
19621963196419651966
1967196819691970GL Data





All characters mentioned, artwork, logos and other visual depictions displayed, unless otherwise noted, are © by DC Comics. No infringement upon those rights is intended or should be inferred. Cover, interior and other artwork scans and vid-caps are used for identification purposes only. The mission of this non-profit site is to entertain and inform. It is in no way authorized or endorsed by DC Comics and/or its parent company. The Webmaster assumes no responsibility for the content or maintenance of external links.